Case studies of Chinese firms' experiences with intellectual property-conditioned state incentives Online publication date: Fri, 26-Jul-2019
by Dan Prud'homme; Xingle Long
International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management (IJTPM), Vol. 19, No. 3, 2019
Abstract: This paper explores how useful China's intellectual property (IP)-conditioned state incentives - especially subsidies and awards tied to patenting requirements - are to improving Chinese firms' competitiveness. Based upon three short case studies derived from interviews with Chinese firms in Jiangsu province, we reach several tentative conclusions. First, the incentives provide external resources that can directly and indirectly help firms improve their competitiveness. Second, the incentives may be particularly useful for firms facing significant patent thickets. Third, the incentives are not always sufficiently funded or accessible. Fourth, the state sometimes precludes the incentives from covering the costs of in-licensing foreign-owned IP and technology, which can be counterproductive to the state's ultimate objective of helping Chinese firms catch up with foreign incumbents. Overall, we conclude that Jiangsu's IP-conditioned state incentives somewhat help indigenous firms improve their competitiveness, but could be more optimally formulated and administered.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management (IJTPM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com