Organisational effectiveness in Hong Kong higher education: implications for human resource management and development Online publication date: Mon, 18-Aug-2003
by J.S. Pounder
International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management (IJHRDM), Vol. 2, No. 3/4, 2002
Abstract: Organisational self-assessment is a popular quality assurance mechanism in higher education but self-assessment exercises tend to rely on criteria that are both subjective and untested. This paper describes a Hong Kong study that attempted to produce more objective assessment criteria through the development of organisational self-assessment scales for Hong Kong higher education organisations. A modified version of the behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS) procedure resulted in four organisational effectiveness scales capable of producing valid and reliable ratings for higher educational organisations in Hong Kong. The nature of the scales highlighted human resource management and development issues that are current in Hong Kong higher education.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management (IJHRDM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com