Potential market redistribution following a big four accounting firm failure Online publication date: Thu, 29-Jul-2021
by Elizabeth A. Donovan; Charles Graves; Amanda M. Grossman; Dan Harris
International Journal of Economics and Accounting (IJEA), Vol. 10, No. 3, 2021
Abstract: This work investigates potential market effects of the hypothetical failure of a big four accounting firm, emphasising how audit and accounting services would be redistributed among the remaining firms. Using graph-theoretic techniques and historical data based upon the failure of Arthur Andersen in 2002, three models of a post-failure redistribution of services are considered. The first model assumes that no mergers/acquisitions occur post-failure amongst the largest accounting firms, besides the redistribution of the failed firm's employees and clients. The second and third models assume that several non-big four firms merge together to create 'the merger', which becomes the approximate size of the pre-failure firm. The results indicate that at least two of the remaining 'big' firms would switch ranks in terms of global revenues, and that the merger becomes as comparatively efficient as the continuing 'big' firms when measured by average revenues generated per employee.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Economics and Accounting (IJEA):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook