Full and open competition in public procurement: a noble lie
by Christopher L. Atkinson; Clifford McCue; Eric Prier
International Journal of Procurement Management (IJPM), Vol. 17, No. 2, 2023

Abstract: The notion that the US federal government provides equal opportunity for all businesses to potentially receive contracts may be, as discussed in Plato's Republic, a noble lie. In this context, the noble lie represents government's attempt to advance an agenda that is ostensibly in the public interest yet is empirically untrue. Using the 'full and open competition' designation and number of offers as a measure of actual competition for government contracts, this research shows that competitive contracting by the US federal government is more an ideal than actual practice. Based on these findings, it is asserted that full and open competition is consistent with a noble lie, existing as an ideal not regularly attained, but nonetheless offered in service of other ends. Contextualising and linking the noble lie with trust signals areas for future research regarding competition in public procurement.

Online publication date: Thu, 04-May-2023

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Procurement Management (IJPM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com