Transaction costs and architectural complexity in no-capability defence acquisition Online publication date: Fri, 13-Oct-2023
by Alexandre Verlaine
International Journal of Procurement Management (IJPM), Vol. 18, No. 3, 2023
Abstract: The paper addresses the research gap between big and small military powers and investigates the challenges in defence acquisition through the perspective of a no-capability NATO nation. First, the author discusses different contractual approaches in no-capability defence acquisition using transaction cost economics and identifies three important transaction cost factors: seconding liaison officers, aligning budget calendars and agreeing on key user requirements. Second, the author inquires the systemic complexity that lies at the heart of modern weapon systems and shapes defence contracts. Drawing on architectural innovation, the analysis demonstrates that small/no-capability NATO nations have a structural disadvantage in relation to developing/acquiring advanced weapon systems. Finally, the author examines the "dual-use development strategy" as a vehicle for overcoming the structural no-capability disadvantage. Two contrasting case studies on Luxembourg and Estonia illustrate the importance of the competent and demanding military customer and the need for further research on the profile of small/no-capability NATO nations.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Procurement Management (IJPM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com