How to interpret umbrella clauses in bilateral investment treaties: different perspectives and solutions Online publication date: Tue, 17-Oct-2023
by Aslı Bayata Canyaş
International Journal of Public Law and Policy (IJPLAP), Vol. 9, No. 4, 2023
Abstract: Umbrella clauses in bilateral investment treaties (BITs) can be named in various ways with differing scopes and effects depending on their texts. It is debatable whether a host state can be held liable based on an umbrella clause in a BIT if it breaches an investment commitment arising from the investment contract. There are two mainstream opinions in this debate: the restrictive and broad approaches. In our opinion, a case-specific approach should be adopted. In each case, the tribunal should act in conformity with the principle of competence-competence. During this analysis, the use of the general rule of interpretation (Art. 31) in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) should be considered.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Public Law and Policy (IJPLAP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com