In what direction is economics heading? Online publication date: Mon, 15-Jan-2024
by Sam de Muijnck
International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education (IJPEE), Vol. 14, No. 2, 2023
Abstract: In the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2008, the status of economics has increasingly come under attack. A central critique is that economics is dogmatic in its adherence to its orthodox tenets. Several studies on current developments in economics, however, argue that mainstream economics has moved beyond the previous orthodoxy. To empirically determine which view is correct, a computational text analysis of PhD dissertations between 2010 and 2017 at five top-ranking universities is performed. The text analysis shows that most of the dissertations explicitly engage with orthodox mainstream economics, while about a quarter do so with nonorthodox mainstream economics. Heterodox economics gets substantially less attention as only 10% of the dissertations engage with it. The findings thus support the view that orthodox economics is still dominant, although it coexists with some nonorthodox mainstream approaches. There is little change over time in the shares of dissertations that engage with the different categories of economics. This runs counter to the idea that the dominance of the current orthodoxy is fading.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education (IJPEE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com