(Ir)relevance of gender in judicial decision-making: reflections on treatment of female murderers in India Online publication date: Wed, 03-Jul-2024
by Aishwarya Deb; Sanjit Kumar Chakraborty
International Journal of Public Law and Policy (IJPLAP), Vol. 10, No. 3, 2024
Abstract: The Indian scholarship on female criminality reveals that most of the brutal crimes committed by women are due to stressful situations or past victimisation. However, what remains unchallenged in the existing literature is the formulation and actual application of criminal law, based on assumptions and sexist stereotypes about gender. The present paper not only focuses on the underlying notions of feminity and masculinity behind the application of criminal law but also the relevance of judges' gender in the decision-making process. The study draws parallels between the homicide cases decided by benches comprising of only male judges and the ones comprising of female judges or both, which are of course very few. While feminist critics believe that assessment of female killers by female judges might solve the discriminatory issues, this study illuminates that the gender of a judge hardly affects their understanding of a woman's lived realities unless they can imagine what it is like to live under the constant shadow of abuse or difficulties.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Public Law and Policy (IJPLAP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com