Legal action against asserted cultural genocide and piracy in China: the strength of the WTO and the weakness of the UNESCO Online publication date: Tue, 01-Dec-2009
by Christophe Germann
International Journal of Intellectual Property Management (IJIPM), Vol. 4, No. 1/2, 2010
Abstract: The new UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions of 2005 is supposed to elevate cultural diversity concerns to a level playing field with trade concerns. However, a critical assessment of this soft law instrument shows that it turned out to be essentially an inventory of political claims for rich and democratic welfare states. This means that this agreement will arguably not improve the situation of a majority of the people in the world. This paper shall seek to verify this opinion in the light of a case study on China. This country currently faces the allegation that she perpetrates cultural genocide in Tibet. At the same time, in a recent WTO dispute resolution procedure, China had to respond to the claim that she does not provide sufficient copyright and trade mark protection in violation of her commitments under the TRIPS Agreement. This paper argues that the outcome of this WTO litigation can have a negative impact on cultural diversity.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Intellectual Property Management (IJIPM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook