Continuing professional education for engineers in Canada: Whose responsibility is it, and how do we get it going?
by Gary W. Heinke
International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning (IJCEELL), Vol. 1, No. 4, 1991

Abstract: This paper reports on the current state of continuing professional education for engineers in Canada. Since the present level of activities is judged to be too low for the needs of the employee engineer, of industry and of the profession, the means for the improvement of this situation are outlined. Increased efforts must come from the users and the suppliers of Continuing Engineering Education. The latter group include the universities, industry, the technical societies, professional associations, and commercial organisations. Specific recommendations are made, which, if implemented, should greatly improve the current level of performance.

Online publication date: Tue, 15-Dec-2009

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning (IJCEELL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com