Legal origin and financial development: new evidence for old claims? The creditor rights index revisited Online publication date: Tue, 30-Sep-2014
by Michael Graff
International Journal of Trade and Global Markets (IJTGM), Vol. 6, No. 4, 2013
Abstract: The 'law and finance theory' predicts that the common law system provides the best basis for financial development and economic growth, followed by Scandinavian and German origin civil law and finally French origin civil law. This paper summarises the key points and a number of sceptical views. It outlines an identification problem, since the majority of common law countries have a market-based financial system, whereas the majority of civil law countries have a bank-based one. Furthermore, the conclusion that a common legal tradition implies a similar set of legal rules and procedures to protect financial investors does not hold empirically. Also, later additions to the theory's creditor right indicators data pool are eliminating the (weak) correspondence between business law and legal family that could be found in the original data set. The claim that creditor protection is largely determined by legal tradition has thus to be reconsidered.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Trade and Global Markets (IJTGM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook