Banks, policy, and risks: how emerging markets differ
by Ashima Goyal
International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP), Vol. 10, No. 1/2/3, 2014

Abstract: Emerging market (EM) banks differ from advanced country banks. They may be weaker in some respects but are stronger in others. Neither of these is well understood leading to inappropriate policy. Scale and cross-border exposures for banks in emerging economies are lower compared to advanced economies. The path of market development and regulatory evolution has helped reduce structural risks but some of the distinctive broad-pattern regulation used creates good incentives that could fill gaps in global regulatory reforms if more widely applied. Since markets remain thin, and interest rate spreads are high, EM banks are vulnerable to large fluctuations in policy rates. Cyclical risks can be contained as long as policy makers moderate the rates. Global regulatory reform can also reduce risks. The argument is illustrated with the Indian case.

Online publication date: Tue, 13-May-2014

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com