The perceived size of packages of complex vs. simple shape depends upon the number of packages presented Online publication date: Mon, 26-May-2014
by Lawrence L. Garber
International Journal of Management Practice (IJMP), Vol. 7, No. 2, 2014
Abstract: A research gap exists regarding the respective effects of package shape and presentation context on size perception. Some prior research shows that complex packages appear larger than simple packages of equal volume. Other research shows the opposite. We resolve the dilemma by showing that shape and presentation context interact to create size impressions. Subjects estimated the relative volumes of sets of packages whose shapes are simple or complex, presented in package sets whose numbers range from two to 16. When packages are displayed in sets of nine or more, packages of simple shape appear larger than packages of complex shape. When packages are presented in sets of eight or less, complex packages appear larger than simple packages. This reversal suggests that the volume estimation strategies employed by consumers change when the complexity of the visual tableau before them leads to cognitive overload.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Management Practice (IJMP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook