Opening the black box of nomination committees: a case study of non-executive director selections in German supervisory boards Online publication date: Tue, 31-Mar-2015
by Axel Walther; Michèle Morner
International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics (IJBGE), Vol. 9, No. 2, 2014
Abstract: One important pre-requisite for the functioning of supervisory boards is the selection of adequate members. Accordingly, corporate governance codes recommend the professionalisation of the board selection process through the establishment of nomination committees. These committees should carry out two principal tasks: 1) drawing up appropriate requirement profiles; 2) rationally structuring the selection process. Analysing in-depth interviews with 27 nomination committees' members of twelve German supervisory boards, we show that not all nomination committees fulfil these tasks satisfactorily; sometimes they merely act symbolically and rationalise decisions already taken by CEOs or main shareholders ex-post. Overall we succeed in identifying three prototypical nomination committees - active, consultative, and box-ticking - and show their impact on the board selection process.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics (IJBGE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook