Title: Modelling and simulating of GTCC system with CO2 removal plant using Aspen Plus
Authors: Rongrong Zhai, Yongping Yang, Liqiang Duan, Qin Yan
Addresses: Beijing Key Laboratory of Safe and Clean Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Condition Monitoring and Control for Power Plant Equipment of Ministry of Education, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China. ' Beijing Key Laboratory of Safe and Clean Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Condition Monitoring and Control for Power Plant Equipment of Ministry of Education, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China. ' Beijing Key Laboratory of Safe and Clean Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Condition Monitoring and Control for Power Plant Equipment of Ministry of Education, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China. ' Beijing Key Laboratory of Safe and Clean Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Condition Monitoring and Control for Power Plant Equipment of Ministry of Education, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China
Abstract: CO2 capture and storage (CCS) from power plants is drawing increasing interest as a potential method for the control of greenhouse gas emissions. A technical parameter study for a CO2 removal plant from flue gas of a gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) syngas-fired power plant was performed, based on absorption/regeneration process with monoethanolamine (MEA) solutions, using Aspen Plus. The efficiency drop due to CO2 removal plant is approximately 12.9 percentage points, from 55.5% to 42.6%. The research results show that the stripper pressure, MEA inlet flow rate, MEA inlet weight percentage, distillate rate and reflux ratio have great impacts on the performance of the CO2 removal plant.
Keywords: CO2 removal plant; gas turbine combine cycle; GTCC; Aspen Plus; reboiler duty; modelling; simulation; carbon dioxide; carbon capture; carbon storage; greenhouse gases; GHG emissions; flue gas; monoethanolamine; stripper pressure; MEA inlet flow rate; MEA inlet weight percentage; distillate rate; reflux ratio.
DOI: 10.1504/IJMIC.2009.027890
International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 2009 Vol.7 No.4, pp.365 - 370
Published online: 14 Aug 2009 *
Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article