Title: A comparative study of financial performance of freestanding ambulatory surgery centres and hospital-based outpatient departments: 1997-2004
Authors: Askar Chukmaitov, Anqi Tang, Robert G. Brooks
Addresses: Division of Health Affairs; Department of Family Medicine and Rural Health, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 West Call Street, Suite 3200, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4300, USA. ' Division of Health Affairs; Department of Family Medicine and Rural Health, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 West Call Street, Suite 3200, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4300, USA. ' Division of Health Affairs; Department of Family Medicine and Rural Health, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 West Call Street, Suite 3200, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4300, USA
Abstract: We compared financial performance of freestanding ambulatory surgery centres (ASCs) and hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs). Patient-level ambulatory surgery data (1997-2004) for the state of Florida were assembled and analysed. We used a pooled, cross-sectional design. We applied multiple regression models to study pricing differences for freestanding ASCs and HOPDs. Substantial charge differences exist for patients undergoing the most common outpatient procedures, and that these differentials are in favour of freestanding ASCs over HOPDs in the majority of studied procedures. These differences in charges are large enough to presume that they may translate into similar difference in actual costs. Although previous research does not show a clear |winner| (neither ASCs nor HOPDs) in terms of quality outcomes, healthcare policymakers, payers, and patients may be led to look more carefully at charge and cost data in their contracting processes, or choosing a certain provider of outpatient services.
Keywords: ambulatory surgery centres; ASCs; hospital outpatient departments; HOPDs; financial performance; total charges; healthcare service providers; USA; United States; quality outcomes; contracting processes.
International Journal of Public Policy, 2010 Vol.6 No.3/4, pp.204 - 218
Published online: 05 Sep 2010 *
Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article