Title: The most advantageous partners for Australia to bilaterally link its emissions trading scheme

Authors: Duy Nong; Mahinda Siriwardana

Addresses: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, 1200 Center Ave Mall, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA ' UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia

Abstract: The theory of marginal abatement cost (MAC) indicates that if a country has a high MAC, it should link its domestic emissions trading scheme (ETS) with a foreign country, which has either low MAC or low emissions reduction target. This strategy will maximise its economic benefits from the linkage compared to its domestic ETS. On the other hand, if a country has a low MAC, it would seek a partner, which has either a high MAC or a high emissions reduction target. Using a computable general equilibrium model, namely the extended GTAP-E model, we found that Australia could yield the greatest economic benefits by linking its ETS with India. China is the second best alternative for Australia to link its ETS, while the European Union is the most expensive option for Australia. Overall, the results support the contention that any bilateral linkage is always better for Australia than operating its own domestic ETS alone.

Keywords: Australia; emissions trading scheme; ETS; linkage; marginal abatement cost; MAC; CGE model.

DOI: 10.1504/IJGW.2018.093745

International Journal of Global Warming, 2018 Vol.15 No.4, pp.371 - 391

Received: 10 Mar 2017
Accepted: 15 Jun 2017
Published online: 03 Aug 2018 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article