Frequency characteristics of a phase optimised active disturbance rejection control Online publication date: Fri, 06-Aug-2021
by Wei Wei; Pengfei Xia; Nan Chen; Min Zuo
International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control (IJMIC), Vol. 36, No. 3, 2020
Abstract: A linear extended state observer (LESO) can just estimate constant disturbances with no steady-state error. To estimate time-varying disturbances more actively and accurately, a phase optimisation law (POL) is proposed. Based on the POL, both a phase optimised extended state observer (POESO) and a phase optimised active disturbance rejection control (POADRC) are proposed. Estimation errors, estimation phases, and frequency response have been analysed and compared. The estimation phase of a POESO always leads the one of a LESO, and a POESO estimates slope disturbances with no steady-state error. Transfer functions of tracking, total disturbance and noise are also obtained. Ability of the POADRC and the linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) to cancel out the total disturbance or suppress noise, and their stable regions are also analysed and compared. Both frequency analyses and numerical results show that the POADRC estimates the time-varying disturbances and improve the closed-loop performance more effectively.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control (IJMIC):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook