Ranking risk attitudes using an integrated AHP-TOPSIS approach Online publication date: Thu, 13-Jan-2022
by Lubna Obaid; Haneen Abuzaid; Dorid Dalalah; Salhah Alhassani; Fouzeya Albastaki; Tania El Khalil
International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences (IJADS), Vol. 15, No. 1, 2022
Abstract: Due to the ambiguity between risk attitudes, this study aims at ranking the different risk attitudes considering the factors that affect the behaviour of the decision-makers. Both the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) are employed to address the characteristics of risk attitudes aiming to highlight the criteria significance and finally to rank the most impactful risk attitude. It was found that regret aversion and risk aversion attitudes have higher impact in real life decision-making problems. In contrast, the maximin and maximax risk attitudes have the lowest importance. Risk seeking and regret aversion attitudes demonstrated the highest importance using TOPSIS of equal-weights while the importance of loss aversion and regret aversion have the highest for the AHP-TOPSIS approach. The results of this study can be beneficial for decision-makers who encounter a variety of risk attitudes in their decision problems.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences (IJADS):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook