A robust framework on each disaster management issue: a comparative perspective
by Jang-Oh Kim; Kyong-Jin Park; Kyoo-Man Ha
International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management (IJBCRM), Vol. 12, No. 4, 2022

Abstract: Despite the existence of many evaluation techniques in the field of disaster management, no systematic study has evaluated if a robust frame is available on each disaster management issue. This paper compares how the USA, Indonesia, and South Korea have used a robust frame on each disaster management issue. The analysis focuses on three comparative factors: stakeholders, resources, and strategies. Qualitative comparative analysis as a methodology plays a role in drawing a similarity and three differences among the US diverse national frames, the Indonesian frequent disaster frames, and the Korean limited regional frames. The study finds that the three nations have similarly tried to address robust frames, but the extent of the three comparative factors has been very different. A robust framework can be transferrable and generalised to apply to every nature of disaster.

Online publication date: Wed, 04-Jan-2023

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management (IJBCRM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com