The diagnosis and treatment of disparities in United Kingdom regional economic performance: a critique Online publication date: Tue, 04-Aug-2009
by Tony Jackson
International Journal of Sustainable Society (IJSSOC), Vol. 1, No. 3, 2009
Abstract: Regional policy has taken the centre stage in delivering current UK government efforts to promote productivity-driven economic growth. This article considers the validity of the prime indicator being used to assess regional economic performance: gross value added (GVA) per head. Evidence indicates that spatial variations in GVA per head across UK regions are not declining. It also indicates that these variations are composed of a mixture of factors, many of which are unrelated to productivity. Since the model of economic growth presented by the UK Treasury is predicated on a belief that a narrowing of regional variations in GVA per head will boost overall UK economic performance via its effects on productivity, these findings offer cause for concern. They suggest that one of the key elements in the UK government's approach to local and regional economic development is founded on a shaky statistical interpretation of the data.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Sustainable Society (IJSSOC):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook