Comparison of in vivo contact positions for PS and PCR TKA implants using Lowest Point and full-contact techniques Online publication date: Wed, 21-Jan-2015
by Saikat Pal, Mohamed R. Mahfouz, Richard D. Komistek, Paul J. Rullkoetter
International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology (IJBET), Vol. 5, No. 2/3, 2011
Abstract: Evaluation of in vivo tibiofemoral contact following total knee arthroplasty provides valuable feedback to clinicians and researchers. The objective of the present study was to evaluate in vivo contact positions using a combination of fluoroscopy and Finite Element (FE) modelling. Center-of-Pressure (COP) contact locations from FE models were compared to Lowest Point (LP) results. Six P.F.C® Sigma Posterior Stabilised (PS) and 6 P.F.C® Sigma Posterior Cruciate Retraining (PCR) implants were analysed during weight-bearing knee flexion from 0° to 90°. Statistically significant differences were observed between the means of anterior-posterior contact position from the LP and COP methods (α = 0.05).
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology (IJBET):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com