Assessing the prediction of employee productivity: a comparison of OLS vs. CART Online publication date: Wed, 14-Sep-2011
by Ina S. Markham
International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management (IJPQM), Vol. 8, No. 3, 2011
Abstract: This research compares the results of utilising an ordinary least squares (OLS) approach vs. a classification and regression tree (CART) approach for identifying employees with a high likelihood of being productive. Relevant performance data were collected from 378 employees of a large garment manufacturer. Past research (Markham et al., 2006) has shown that a combined genetic algorithm with an artificial neural network substantially outperformed (R² = 0.30) an equivalent OLS solution (R² = 0.14) when predicting individual level productivity. The current research compares the use of CART to OLS using the same data set. With an R² of 0.43, the CART results were even more powerful in identifying and classifying high performance employees. The implications of this finding for the field of productivity research and employee selection are discussed.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management (IJPQM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com