Transparency and credible commitment: most-favoured-customer provisions and the sustainability of price discrimination Online publication date: Tue, 30-Sep-2014
by James Stodder; Houman Younessi
International Journal of Trade and Global Markets (IJTGM), Vol. 6, No. 3, 2013
Abstract: Lump-sum rebates can protect price-discriminators against reselling. Large customers, however, can bargain for a larger rebate. This paper shows how sellers can make a credible commitment to not bargain: a price discriminating formula is published as a Most-Favoured-Customer (MFC) contract: if any MFC gets a rebate greater than specified by formula, so do all. The larger the rebate asked for, or the finer the degree of discrimination, the more groups affected by deviations from this formula. Thus the seller loses more revenue. Incentive and welfare effects are illustrated with global incomes data.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Trade and Global Markets (IJTGM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com