Decision tree classifiers for mass classification Online publication date: Sun, 25-Jan-2015
by R. Nithya; B. Santhi
International Journal of Signal and Imaging Systems Engineering (IJSISE), Vol. 8, No. 1/2, 2015
Abstract: Mass detection from the mammogram is important for breast cancer diagnosis. This paper proposes the classification method for breast masses using the decision tree techniques. This paper presents the comparison result of 12 decision tree algorithms including ADTree, BFTree, DecisionStump, FT, C4.5, LADTree, LMT, NBTree, RandomForest, RandomTree, REPTree and CART. In comparison, four performance metrics were used. The aim of the study is to determine the best decision tree classifier for mass classification from BI-RADS features (mass shape, mass margin, assessment and subtlety). In the experimental studies, all these decision tree algorithms are applied on the UCI data set. Experimental results show that LADTree and LMT has a better performance than ADTree, BFTree, DecisionStump, FT, C4.5, NBTree, RandomForest, Random Tree, REPTree and CART.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Signal and Imaging Systems Engineering (IJSISE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com