Pay for performance in the public sector: the challenge of fairness Online publication date: Mon, 12-Oct-2015
by Kirsten Bregn
International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance (IJBAF), Vol. 5, No. 2, 2015
Abstract: This paper contributes to an explanation of why pay for performance (PFP) in the public sector has difficulties in functioning properly and why, despite the difficulties, its use is continued. To do so, the paper draws on insights from behavioural economics. The explanation focuses on cognitive biases in the way people process information. These biases, affecting employees as well as managers, are reasons for employees' perception of unfairness in the allocation of PFP. Attempts to reduce this perception of unfairness may conflict with other considerations concerning motivation and efficiency, and generate a number of dilemmas. The cognitive biases may impede managers' rational reflections on the dilemmas associated with attempts to reduce the perception of unfairness, and then also the rational choice of trade-offs. Furthermore, the cognitive biases may cause managers to underestimate the negative effects of PFP and, consequently, PFP may be maintained even if it is not appropriate in the specific context.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance (IJBAF):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook