Comparative analysis of China's interlock firms network in five regions Online publication date: Tue, 12-Jan-2016
by Yue Chen; Xiaoyu Zhu; Zeyuan Liu
International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies (IJKMS), Vol. 6, No. 4, 2015
Abstract: The complexity of the interlock firms' network is a miniature of the whole social economy system. This paper explored the regional interlock firms' network in China (including Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing) through vertical and horizontal comparative analysis. The results demonstrated the ties and differences of the network in the historical, regional, structural and multiplicity scale. The conclusion is that both the amount and proportion of interlock firms are increased. By the influence of the degree of marketisation, industry characteristics and geographical position, the interlock directors in Beijing are more national and diversified, and those who are in Guangdong are local and lower diversified. The firms in Beijing and Shanghai tend to interlock cross-industry more. The firms in Zhejiang are significant in multiplicity. Those interlock firms network in Beijing and in Guangdong are relatively dispersive, compared to the firms in Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang which are more concentrated.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies (IJKMS):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook