Labelling contributions made in university forums: comparing the use of compulsory and optional scaffolds in specific forum environments Online publication date: Tue, 05-Jul-2016
by Noemí Verdú; Jaume Sanuy
International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL), Vol. 10, No. 4, 2015
Abstract: Virtual forums are commonly used in higher education, yet they do not always yield desirable results. This study analyses whether the students' contributions are more elaborate when the categorisation of their messages prior to making a contribution is compulsory rather than optional. Using a coding scheme based on Stahl's (2000) model of collaborative knowledge building, the content of messages from 30 forums in different subjects was analysed. The results show that processes of explanation are used the most. In contrast, negotiations and formalisation are used very little, if at all. Furthermore, the results highlight that compulsory - as opposed to optional - assignation of a scaffold prior to making a contribution does not make discourse any more elaborate. However, it is confirmed that students learn merely by having labels available for use. Consequently, we suggest that scaffolds and other cognitive and communicative tools be incorporated into general forums.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook